7 INTRODUCTION TO OMNIDIRECTIONAL HALO
23The useful but infrequently used word epistomology means science of the thought processes. A total epistomological reorientation and, to the best of my knowledge, a unique philosophical reconceptioning, regarding the regenerative constel- lar logic of the structuring of the universe (both as a new cosmology and as a new cosmogony), seem to have followed gradually upon my hypothetically-initiated querying regarding the possibility of formulating more comprehensive and symmetrical statements regarding dawningly apparent natural laws. I intuited in irrepressible degree that such a potential formulation might be accruing and harvestable in all of our acceleratingly-reconsidered and progressively-integrated world- around, all-history experience as now only diffusely inventoried at the middle decades of the twentieth century.
4Out of multi-overlaid experience patternings there sometimes emerges an awareness of what we may call a coincidence pattern---a localized thickening of points. These emergent patterns of frequency congruences and concentrations display a unique configuration-integrity which has up to now been so dilute in any one experience as to be only invisibly common to many differentiated or special experiences, e.g., a pack of one hundred 4-inch by 5-inch file cards each riddled with hundreds of different sized small holes. Each card appears to be chaotically patterned with holes. However, when the cards are stacked with edges alligned three holes in each card are vertically alligned 5 all others are obscured by blank spaces on one card or another. A triangular pattern relationship of the light coming through three tubes in the stack of cards is now lucidly conceptual. To such persistently emergent, uniquely mutual, coincidence-patterning relationships as the same triangle array of holes in each and every card we may apply the term ‘‘pattern generalization’’ as used in a mathematical sense, in contradistinction to the word ‘‘generalization’’ as used in the literary sense. The latter often means a too-ambi- tious subject range which consequently permits only superficial considerations of any specific case data.
5When the uniquely emergent generalized patternings become describable by us in mentally regenerative conceptual terms, as completely divorced from any one of the specific sensorial conditions of any of the special experiences out of which they emerged, yet apparently, as seen in retrospect to have been persistent in every special case, then we may tentatively assume such unique mutual pattern content to be a generalized conceptual principle, as for instance the conception of tension as opposed to compression independent of textures, smells, colors, sound, or size of any one tension-dominated experience.
6It is in just such an epistomological process that we discover that size is not a generalized conceptual principle. Whether referring to the size of an object in respect to other objects or the sizes of any one object’s subdivision, size emerges exclusively as afrequency concept uniquely differentiating-out each ‘‘specialized case.’’ Generalized shape conceptioning is independent of size. A triangle is a triangle independent of size.
7When a second order of pattern distillation as a generalized conceptual principle emerges, but this time exclusively from the emergently-induced co-ordinate consideration of a plurality of generalized conceptual principles themselves, each independent of any special case sensoriality, and in such a regeneratively- recognizable manner of patterning as to provide a means of mathematical accounting and therefrom a tentative forecasting capability, not only of generalized developments but also of special forward experiences in the terms of specific sensorial conditions, and those calculated forecast conditions materialize, and the forecasting capability is subsequently verified by recurrent experimental demonstrations under controlled generalized conditions, then we may tentatively assume that we have discovered at least a clause of ‘‘natural law.’’ For example, we tentatively assume that radiation is generalized compression and that gravity is generalized tension and that tension and compression are inseparable, pr ecessionaly-complimentary functions of universal structure.
8 Newly recognized generalizable principles seem emergent in unprecedentedly accelerating accumulation as reported from the instrumentally extended range, velocity, and exactitude of special case experiences in the most recent moments of history’s scientific venturing. The manywhere local probings have been meticulously organized and reported regarding measurable relationships and rates of changing relationships throughout the vast macrocosmic and exquisite miscrocosmic angle and frequency universe events both infra and ultra to man’s direct tuneability yet instrumentally tuneable and transformably readable within regeneratively informative tolerance despite inherently limited observational exactitude.
9 Out of cumulative patterning overlays there emerges what seem to be generalized principles apparently governing all associative and disassociative transformings and their resultant re- generatively persistent hierarchy of constellar configurations. These hierarchies of constellar configurations disclose in turn a hierarchy of dynamically symmetrical constellation phases and their respective maxima-minima, asymmetric and complimentary, accommodative transformabilities which are apparently permitted within an omnirational, omnidirectional, omniequi- economic, energy-accounting, co-ordinate system of universe. This omnirational, arithmetical-geometrical accountability is of such sublime simplicity in contrast to the awkward ‘‘mathemat- ics’’of all known yesterdays as to have occasioned an almost universal incredibility and nonconsideration of its potential significance though it has been in disclosure for one quarter of a century.
10 This co-ordinate system may be described as an isotropic vector system; that is, a generalized Avagadro system in which the energy conditions and relative quanta ratios are everywhere the same yet multi-differentiable in local patterning aspects, which aspects are interchangeably emergent without altering the comprehensive energy equilibrium or its unitary totality as implicit in the Law of Conservation of Energy by which it is assumed that energy may be neither created nor lost.
11 The discovered co-ordinate system is apparently governed by generalized laws, some of whose mathematical equatability I have been allowed not only to discern (as far as I know for the first time by anyone) but also to codify and translate into unique structural realizations. This codification governs the total co-ordinate abundance ratios of the unique pattern aspect relationships of uniquely irreducible co-operative function aspects of locally nonsimultaneous events and their equilibrious pattern totality.
12 Discovery of the primary and corollary laws of constantly co-ordinate relative abundance of pattern function-aspects of totality as an omnirational regularity governing all local pat- ternings of universe as a minimum-maximum family of com- plexedly complementary yet uniquely identifiable conceptual function-patterning relationships followed upon intuitive formulations of the seemingly most comprehensive self-querying question I was capable of propounding to myself regarding possible detectable pattern significances accruing to progressive life experience integrations and overlays.
13 That most comprehensive question was, ‘‘What do you mean by the word ‘universe’?’’ ‘‘If you cannot answer, you had best abandon use of the word ‘universe’ for it will have no meaning.’’ My intuitively-adopted rules for self-questioning and answering were that the answer must be made exclusively from man’s experience patterns. I learned many years later that the Nobel physicist Percival Bridgeman had identified this same rule adopted by Einstein as ‘‘operational procedure,’’ subsequently a much-abused phrase. My answer (or discard of the word ‘‘universe’’ as a communication tool) was operationally inherent: ‘‘Universeis the aggregate of all consciously apprehended and communicated (to self or relayed to others) experience of man.’’ If my finite answer holds against all specific experience challenges as being comprehensively anticipatory and adequate, the universe is finite, and all its components definable. Each life as we know it is definitive, i.e., consists of a plurality of terminable, ergo definite, experiences, beginning with each awakening and terminating with each surrender to sleep (no man can prove upon awakening that he is the man who he thinks went earlier to sleep, or that aught else which he thinks he recollects is other than a convincing dream). The intermit
14 tent beginnings and endings of conscious experience constitute an aggregate of definitive experiences---and the aggregate is therefore finite.
15 In the recent moments of historical experience, men as scientists adopted the law of conservation of energy: as predicated upon the sum total experience of physicists which recalled no contradiction to this hypothesis. They thus accomplished a finite packaging of all physical behaviors of physical universe as predicated also upon the hypothesis that all physical phenomena are entirely energetic.
16 By embracing all the energetic phenomena of total experience, the scientists secured a synergetic advantage for all energy accounting and prospecting. ‘‘Synergy’’ means ‘‘behavior of whole systems unpredicted by the behavior of any of its components or by any sub-array of its components.’’ Corollary to synergy is the law of the whole system. Systems are definite as they return upon themselves in a plurality of directions, ergo have concave inwardness and convex outwardness, ergo inherently subdivide universe into mutually exclusive definitive macro and micro entities. The law of whole system states that, given the sum of whole system pattern conception its component behaviors may be differentially discovered and predictably described as required by the already evidenced behavior functions implicit in the a priori-definitive experience and concep- tioning of any given experience-verified system. Thus by the law of whole system as corollary of synergy, the component behaviors of systems may be predictably differentiated as primary and secondary componential sub-divisions of whole system and then progressively isolated and locally reconsidered for further dichotomy.
17 Adopting synergetic advantage, science hypothesized that
18 the physical portion of universe is energetic and finite. Under this hypothesis Einstein wrote his equation of physical universe as E=MC2. This said that the total of local system energy is the product of all concentric local systems of energy’s self-interfered, shunt-holding patterns (M for mass) as multiplied by the entirely noninterfered local omnidirectional velocity of surface growth of an omnidirectional, outward-bound spherical wave of radiant energy (in terms of second power of radial wave module frequency growth rate).
19 In Einstein’s formula mass constitutes all the patterns of precessionally self-interfered and concentrically shunted, ergo locally articulated and locally and periodically regenerative holding patterns of energy. This is also to say that M equals all the locally complex, concentric, self-associative, unique holding patterns of all energy, and C2 equals all the eccentrically disassociative individual patternings of all energy (C being the radial or linear speed of radiant energy, which is approximately 186,000 mps).
20 But physical science lacked the experience which might have persuaded it to hypothesize what all universe is. Physical science therefore restricted its comprehensive accounting strategy to the special case of definitive isolations within the physical portion of universe. This left the remainder of all experiences, no matter how earnestly and meticulously reconsidered, outside the definitive portion of comprehended experiences of universe, i.e., the physicists said all that is not physically encompassed as E=MC2 is metaphysical.
21 However,bymy definition of universe, all thatwasrelegated to metaphysical nebulosity is now embraced by finite universe along with the physically energetic wherefore all the hitherto ‘‘inexact sciences’’ may become rigorously defined, enjoying equatable treatability at optimum degree of determinability.
22 I have found a general law of total synergetical structuring, which we may call ‘‘The Law of Structure.’’ This law discloses that ‘‘universe’’ of total man experience may not be simultaneously recollected and reconsidered, but may be subdivided into a plurality of locally tuneable event foci or ‘‘points’’ of which a minimum of four positive and four negative points are required as a ‘‘considerable set’’; that is, as a first finite subdivision of finite universe. (This fourness coincides with basic quanta strategy.) All experience is reduced to nonsimultaneously ‘‘considerable sets’’ and holds irrelevant to consideration all those experi ences which are either too large and therefore too infrequent, or too miniscule and therefore too frequent, to be tuneably considerable as pertaining to the residual constellation of approximately congruent recollections of experiences. A ‘‘considerable set’’ inherently subdivides all the rest of irrelevant experiences of universe into macro-cosmic and micro-cosmic sets immediately outside or immediately within the considered set of experience foci.
23 There are two inherent twilight zones of ‘‘tantalizingly- almost-relevant recollections" spontaneously fed back in contiguous frequency bands---the macro-twilight and the microtwilight.
24 It is a corollary of this first subdivision of universe that a considerable set is a locally definitive system of universe returning upon its considerability in all circumferential directions and therefore has an inherent withinness and withoutness, which two latter differ entiableyizzzcft’oTzs inherently subdivide all universe into the two unique extremes of macro and micro frequencies.
25 The ‘‘Law of Structure’’ says that ‘‘local structure is a set of frequency associable (spontaneously tuneable) recollectable experience relationships, having a regenerative constellar patterning as the precessional resultants of concentrically shunted periodic self-interferences, or coincidences of its systematic plurality of definitive vectorial frequency, wave length and angle inter-relationships.’’
26 The precessionally regenerative concentricity of structure is antientropic, and evolutes toward optimally economic local compressibility and symmetry. (See Dymaxion World of Buckminster Fuller, by Robert Marks, for Fuller’s Law of omniopti- mally-economic, omnitriangulated-point-system, symmetry relationships and relative abundance of frequency modulated multiplicative subdivision of unitary local systems; i.e., M (mass) means: All the universe’s self-interfering complexes having concentrically self-precessing, local-focal-holding patterns resulting in locally regenerative constellar associabilities as positive-outside-in structures. C2 (radiation) means: All the universe’s nonself-interfering complexes having eccentrically inter-precessing, omnidirectionally diffusing patterns resulting in comprehensively degenerative negative Emits of dissociabi- lities as negative (inside-out) de-structures.
27 In the chapters on Energetic-Synergetic Geometry I identify second powering with the point population of any one radiant (eccentric) or gravitational (concentric) wave systems circumferential arrays of any given radius stated in terms of frequency of modular subdivisions of the circumferential arrays radially-read systems’ concentricity layering; third powering with the total point population of all the successive wave layers of the system; fourth powering with the interpointal domain volumes '■> fifth and sixth powering as products of multiplication by frequency doublings and treblings, etc. The Doppler effect or wave reception frequency-modulation caused
28 by motions of the observer and the observed are concentric wave system fourth and fifth powering accelerations.
29 
The Dopier effect is usually conceived of as an approximately ‘‘linear’’ experience. ‘‘You,’’
the observer, stand beside a railway track (which is a ‘‘linear’’ model); a swift train approaches
with whistle valve held open (at constant frequency pitch as heard ‘‘on board’’ by the engineer
‘‘blowing’’ the whistle). The whistle sound comes to you at approximately 700 mph, but the train
is speeding toward you at 100 mph. The train’s motion reduces the interval between the
successive
30 Fig. 1. Ornnidopler Effect
31 wave emissions, which in effect decreases the wave length which gives it ‘‘higher’’ pitch as heard at your remote and ‘‘approached’’ hearing position. After the train goes by, the train runs away from each successive wave emission, thus increasing the interval between wave ‘‘crests’’ and therefore lengthening the waves, which apparently ‘‘lowers’’ the pitch as you hear it but not as others elsewhere may hear it. This is pure observational ‘‘relativity.’’ But the real picture of the Dopier effect is not linear; it is omnidirectional.
32 The Dopier effect may also be explained in omnidirectional, experience-patterning conceptionality which is more informative than the familiar linear conceptioning of the rail-
33 road train and ‘‘you, at the crossing.’’ ‘‘You’’ were flying in an air transport which exploded, and because of the sudden change in pressure differential between your in’ards and your out’ards at high altitude you personally have just been ‘‘exploded’’ into many separate parts receding from one another at high velocity. A series of secondary explosions follows from somewhere in the center of the galaxy of exploding debris, as one item after another of the late airplane’s explosive cargo is reached by progressive local conflagration-heat concentrations. The sound waves of the successive explosions speed after your receding parts amongst which are your two ear diaphragms as yet ‘‘stringily’’ interconnected with your exploding brain cells, which ‘‘hear’’ the explosion’s sound waves first at low pitch. But as your parts explode from one another at a decelerating rate because of air friction, etc., the waves of remote explosion sounds ‘‘shorten’’ and pitches go ‘‘up.’’ Now consider many separate, nonsimultaneous, secondary explosions of your various exploding parts all of varying intensities of energetic content and in varying degrees of remoteness and realize that the decelerations and accelerations of Dopier effects will render some of the explosive reverberations infra and some ultra to your tuning range limits of hearing, so that the sum total of heard events provides very different total conceptioning as heard from various points in the whole galaxy of exploding events whose separate components would tend to new grouping concentrations.
34 The Halo discovered in the next chapter is that of an omnidirectional, complex, high-frequency, Dopler-effected hypothetical-zone experience in an omnidirectional universal maelstrom of nonsimultaneous near and far explosions and their interaccelarating and refractive wave frequency patternings. Several of these fundamental concepts are also repeated several 128
35 times in Halo, being reintroduced in various complex associations each of which provides unique discoveries.
36 In order to generate a spontaneous comprehension of the significance of the thoughts expressed in ‘‘Halo,’’ which now follows, the latter essay will open with a swiftly martialed digest of the epistomological concepts of this introduction.